Best NZ Casinos With Flexepin: Payment Checks
Available in USPayment availability can vary by account, and a deposit option does not necessarily apply to withdrawals or bonus funds.
Table of Contents
- Confirming Flexepin Availability for a New Zealand Account
- What Payment Limits Mean for a Flexepin Deposit
- Checking Payment Support Before Choosing an Online Casino
- A Deposit Method Is Not Necessarily a Withdrawal Method
- How a Flexepin Deposit and Casino Withdrawal Are Separate Steps
- Withdrawal Timing Depends on the Payout Route
- Reading a Flexepin Casino Promo Code as a Set of Conditions
- Deposit Bonuses and the Amount That Can Actually Be Withdrawn
- Account Sign-In, Identity Checks, and Payment Security
- Assessing Casino Payment Options Without Assuming Flexepin Support
Confirming Flexepin Availability for a New Zealand Account
A payment logo on a casino page is not proof that the method can be used by every account. The cashier shown after sign-in is more relevant: payment options can vary by country and account eligibility, and a method listed in general promotional material may not appear for a New Zealand account.
That distinction matters when checking whether an online casino accepts Flexepin. A specialist review has reported that some New Zealand casino cashiers accept PaysafeCard deposits, subject to availability for an eligible account. This is information about PaysafeCard, not confirmation of Flexepin. The names refer to different payment methods; acceptance of one cannot establish acceptance of the other. Treating them as interchangeable would turn a specific payment claim into an unsupported assumption.
Check the account-specific cashier
The practical test is whether Flexepin is offered in the cashier for the particular New Zealand account. A general list of payment logos, a page describing payment options for several countries, or a review that does not specify account eligibility cannot settle that question. The relevant option should appear in the account’s deposit flow, with the applicable instructions and terms available before a transaction is started.
Choosing a casino that supports Flexepin starts with checking what is known about each option. This list provides a concise reference point for readers considering NZ casinos.
License: Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000064 Neospin is listed with a Tobique Gaming Commission licence, number 0000064.
License: Malta Gaming Authority, licence no. MGA/B2C/370/2017 Play Grand is listed with a Malta Gaming Authority licence, number MGA/B2C/370/2017.
License: Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000091 7Bit Casino is listed with a Tobique Gaming Commission licence, number 0000091.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Wintino has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Lamabet has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days.
License: Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000002 Ricky Casino is listed with a Tobique Gaming Commission licence, number 0000002.
License: Malta Gaming Authority, licence no. MGA/B2C/394/2017 N1 Casino is listed with a Malta Gaming Authority licence, number MGA/B2C/394/2017.
License: 07017519840 · Payout speed: 1-3 business days Zotabet has the identifier 07017519840 listed and a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days.
License: Curaçao Gaming Authority, licence no. OGL/2024/165/0185 BitStarz is listed with a Curaçao Gaming Authority licence, number OGL/2024/165/0185.
If Flexepin is absent, that is not evidence that a PaysafeCard option is equivalent. Nor does an option shown elsewhere establish that it is enabled for the account in question. Payment availability is conditional, not a permanent feature that can safely be inferred from a brand name or a page viewed outside the account.
The same care applies to reviews. A specialist review can provide a lead, but its statement needs to be read narrowly: which method it names, whether it concerns deposits, and whether it refers to New Zealand accounts. If it says PaysafeCard, it has not verified Flexepin. If it describes a cashier without identifying the account market, it has not established availability for a New Zealand customer. A precise claim is more useful than a longer list of payment brands.
Do not treat a payment family as one method
Payment services may have related branding or appear in similar parts of a cashier, but that does not make their acceptance interchangeable. A casino can support one named method and not another. The deposit screen’s exact label therefore matters. “PaysafeCard” should not be read as “Flexepin,” and an article that mentions one should not be used as evidence for the other.
This is particularly important when the question is whether a casino accepts Flexepin deposits, rather than whether it offers prepaid or voucher-style payments in general. Broad descriptions conceal the detail that determines whether a transaction can proceed: the method itself must be available for the New Zealand account. Until that is confirmed in the account-specific cashier or directly through the operator’s stated support channel, the appropriate status is unconfirmed—not accepted.
Availability also does not settle every aspect of a payment method. Specialist payment reviews note that a method’s presence for deposits can differ from its availability for withdrawals, and the options can vary for New Zealand accounts. That is a separate check from whether Flexepin can fund an account. A deposit listing should be understood only as evidence about the stated deposit option, not as proof of wider payment support.
Keep regulatory information separate from payment claims
New Zealand’s online casino framework has distinct regulatory responsibilities. The Department of Internal Affairs is the primary gambling regulator and oversees the online casino licensing framework. The Gambling Commission hears and determines casino licensing applications, issues online casino licences, and approves changes to licence conditions.
Those roles provide context for the market; they do not confirm that a particular cashier accepts Flexepin. A regulatory statement, licence reference, or general description of a casino’s services cannot replace checking the payment option for the relevant account. Payment acceptance is an operational detail, and the method named in the cashier remains the point to verify.
A sound comparison of casino sites that may accept Flexepin therefore begins with a narrow question: does the New Zealand account itself show Flexepin as an available deposit method? PaysafeCard references, generic payment lists, and claims about other countries do not answer it. The distinction may look small on a page crowded with logos, but it determines whether the stated method is actually the one being offered.
- Check the account-specific cashier for Flexepin
- Verify instructions and terms in the deposit flow
- Read specialist reviews for specific method names
- Rely on general payment logos as proof of availability
- Treat PaysafeCard as equivalent to Flexepin
- Infer availability from a general country list
What Payment Limits Mean for a Flexepin Deposit
A deposit amount and a withdrawal limit are separate figures. A casino cashier may display a maximum for money going into an account, while the casino’s payout rules govern how much can leave it. A limit described for withdrawals should not be treated as a Flexepin deposit limit: it concerns the payout side of the account, not the amount accepted at deposit.
For anyone comparing a Flexepin casino, this distinction matters because the amount paid in does not by itself establish how much can later be withdrawn in one transaction or over a set period. A specialist review describes casinos and payment providers as potentially setting per-transaction, daily, weekly or monthly withdrawal caps. These conditions can apply at different levels: a casino may set a limit for its own cashier, while a payment provider may apply a separate limit to the transfer route.
The practical result is that a requested withdrawal can be affected by more than the balance shown on screen. If a casino limit applies to each transaction, the permitted amount concerns an individual payout. A daily, weekly or monthly cap instead measures withdrawals across the relevant period. Where more than one rule applies, the effective amount can depend on which condition is reached first. A large balance is therefore not the same thing as an amount that can be transferred in a single request.
This is a payout calculation, not evidence about the amount a casino will accept through Flexepin. Deposit limits and withdrawal limits should be checked as separate terms. A cashier’s deposit screen may state what can be paid in; withdrawal rules may appear elsewhere in the account or payment conditions. Treating one figure as if it governs both directions can produce a mistaken estimate of the funds available for release.
Larger withdrawals may also receive additional review, according to the same type of specialist review. That review can affect the amount or timing of a transaction without changing the stated cap itself. The distinction is between a formal limit and a check applied to a larger request: one defines a boundary, while the other may mean the transaction receives further scrutiny. A balance that falls within a displayed cap is not necessarily the end of the assessment.
A useful way to read any limit is to identify its unit and scope. The unit might be one transaction or withdrawals accumulated over a named period. The scope might be the casino, the payment provider, or both. The wording also matters: a cap on a payout route does not necessarily describe the account’s overall withdrawal allowance, and a casino-level cap does not automatically describe what a provider will process. Each condition has to be read against the party that sets it.
A refund is a different case from an ordinary casino withdrawal. A specialist review reports that a provider refund can carry a NZD 12 fee. That figure should be treated as a condition attached to a reported refund scenario, not as a standard charge for every Flexepin deposit or every casino payment. Where such a fee applies, the amount returned would be reduced by the fee; the relevant comparison is the refund amount before the charge against the net amount received afterward.
Attention: A withdrawal limit concerns the payout side of the account and should not be treated as a Flexepin deposit limit.
The fee also changes the arithmetic of a small refund more sharply than a large one, because a fixed charge takes a larger share of a smaller returned amount. That does not establish that every payment is refundable, or that a refund is the normal alternative to a casino payout. It means only that the refund terms deserve separate attention when a provider is returning funds. A deposit, a casino withdrawal and a provider refund are not interchangeable transaction labels.
For a New Zealand account, the useful comparison is therefore between the stated deposit conditions, any casino withdrawal caps, any payment-provider limits and any refund charge that applies to the particular case. The amount entered at the cashier is only one part of that calculation. The relevant final figure depends on which limits govern the payout and whether a refund fee is involved; reading the deposit amount alone cannot settle it.
Checking Payment Support Before Choosing an Online Casino
A balance shown in New Zealand dollars is a display setting, not proof that a withdrawal will arrive in New Zealand dollars. A specialist casino review notes that conversion rates or exchange margins can affect the amount received, even when the account balance is presented in NZD. The distinction is material: the figure on screen and the amount credited to a bank account or other destination are not necessarily measured on the same basis.
For anyone comparing Flexepin online casino sites, the useful question is not simply whether the site labels its balance in NZD. It is whether the casino’s terms say what currency applies when funds are settled, and whether any conversion affects the final amount. A site can present balances in a familiar currency while applying a different currency or conversion basis at settlement. The NZD display alone cannot resolve that point.
Display currency and settlement currency
A display currency is the unit used to show figures in the account interface. Settlement currency is the unit in which a payment is processed and credited. Those two can match, but one does not establish the other. A casino balance of a particular NZD amount therefore cannot be treated as a promise that the same nominal amount will reach a New Zealand account.
The calculation can be understood as a sequence: the casino balance is assessed, any applicable conversion is made, and the resulting amount is credited in the currency supported by the settlement route. If conversion rates or an exchange margin apply, the credited figure can differ from the displayed balance. The difference is not necessarily a separate fee shown as a line item; it may be reflected in the exchange calculation itself. The terms are what determine how the operator describes that calculation.
This matters when comparing casinos because a balance that looks clear at the account level may conceal a different settlement basis. A headline balance in NZD is convenient for reading, but it is not enough to calculate the final amount received. The relevant information is the currency used for settlement and the basis on which any conversion is applied.
What to check in the terms
Payment information should be read for the settlement currency, not just the currency selector or the balance display. The terms or cashier information may distinguish the currency used to display an account from the currency used for a payment. If that distinction is not clear, the amount received cannot be inferred from the on-screen NZD figure alone.
A display currency is the unit used for the interface, whereas the settlement currency is the unit in which a payment is actually processed and credited.
The conversion wording also matters. A stated exchange rate and a rate that includes an exchange margin can produce different outcomes. Where the terms explain a margin or conversion basis, that information helps establish how the displayed balance may translate into the amount credited. Where the wording is unclear, the financial result remains unclear too; a site’s NZD label does not fill the gap.
A sound comparison records three separate details: the balance currency, the settlement currency, and the stated conversion basis. Keeping them separate prevents a common accounting error: treating a displayed figure as though it were already the final credited amount. The same check applies when comparing a Flexepin casino with other online casinos; the payment brand does not determine the currency in which a later settlement is made.
Comparing the final amount, not the screen
The practical comparison is between what the account shows and what the terms say will be settled. If both are in NZD and no conversion is described, the calculation may be easier to follow, but the terms still govern. If settlement uses another currency, the exchange basis becomes part of the cost of receiving the funds. A favourable-looking balance can therefore be a poor guide to the final amount.
This is also why a list of casinos described as the best Flexepin online casinos cannot be evaluated on payment branding alone. A payment option and a currency display answer different questions. The former concerns how an account is funded; the latter concerns how figures are presented. Neither, by itself, establishes the currency or conversion basis used for settlement.
A careful review of payment support therefore treats NZD display as one data point, not as a payout promise. The settlement currency and any conversion terms determine whether the amount shown translates directly into the amount received. When those details are stated plainly, comparisons can be made on the final accounting basis rather than on a convenient screen label.
A Deposit Method Is Not Necessarily a Withdrawal Method
A casino cashier can show a payment option for adding funds without offering it as a way to receive winnings. Deposit support and payout support are separate conditions. A specialist payment review notes that a method’s availability to New Zealand accounts, and its ability to handle withdrawals, can differ from its availability for deposits. Seeing an option at the deposit stage therefore does not establish that the same option will appear when a withdrawal is requested.
That distinction matters when assessing a casino that accepts Flexepin deposits. A deposit option answers one question: whether funds can be sent to the casino through that route. It does not, on its own, answer how a casino will return funds. The cashier may list separate methods for deposits and withdrawals, or set different conditions for using a method in each direction. The relevant terms are the ones attached to the account and the transaction, not the payment logo displayed on a general information page.
For New Zealand accounts, the available routes should be checked in the casino cashier and in the payment terms before depositing. A method listed in a generic page or in material describing another country may not describe the options available to a New Zealand account. Even where a casino accepts a particular deposit, the withdrawal page may show that another route is required. Payment support is not a single yes-or-no feature; it has an incoming side and an outgoing side.
Payment Support
- Deposit support and payout support are separate conditions
- A method available for funding may not be offered for withdrawals
- Payout routes may require a bank account, digital wallet, or cryptocurrency address
- Acceptance of a deposit method is not a promise of two-way service
If the deposit method cannot receive casino payouts, a separate route may be needed. A specialist payment review identifies a bank account, digital wallet, or cryptocurrency address as possible withdrawal destinations in that situation. Which route is available depends on the casino’s terms and the options presented for the account. The practical consequence is straightforward: the deposit method and the destination for winnings may be different, so both should be considered before funds are committed.
A useful check is to compare the cashier’s deposit and withdrawal sections rather than infer one from the other. The deposit section should be checked for the method being considered; the withdrawal section should be checked for the route that can receive funds. If the latter lists a bank account, wallet, or cryptocurrency address instead, that is a separate requirement—not evidence that the deposit method failed. The account holder needs access to the listed payout route and must be able to use it under the casino’s terms.
The distinction also changes how “best” should be understood when comparing casinos that accept Flexepin deposits. Deposit acceptance alone is an incomplete measure of fit. A casino may accept a preferred method for funding while requiring a different destination for withdrawals. In that case, the relevant comparison includes whether the payout route is usable, not merely whether the deposit button is present. A payment method’s name on a cashier is not a promise of two-way service.
For Flexepin specifically, no assumption should be made that deposit acceptance means Flexepin can also receive winnings. The withdrawal method needs to be confirmed separately for the New Zealand account. If it is not supported for payouts, the casino’s stated alternative—such as a bank account, digital wallet, or cryptocurrency address—becomes part of the payment arrangement from the outset. That is the difference between a deposit option and a complete route for moving money into and out of a casino account.
How a Flexepin Deposit and Casino Withdrawal Are Separate Steps
A deposit and a withdrawal are separate transactions, with different checks and destinations. Paying into a casino with Flexepin, where that option is available to a New Zealand account, does not itself establish how winnings can be withdrawn. The deposit method’s role ends when the casino credits the account; a later payout follows the casino’s withdrawal process.
A specialist review describes the withdrawal sequence as beginning with a request that the casino must approve. Only after approval does the external payment transfer start. That distinction matters: a submitted request is not yet a payment in transit, and a displayed balance is not the same as money released to an account.
The casino’s review can involve identity verification, payment checks, or conditions attached to a bonus. Any of these can delay approval. If bonus conditions remain unmet, for instance, the withdrawal may be affected before the payment provider or bank becomes involved. The transfer stage cannot be assessed accurately until the casino has completed its own decision.
A specialist review also notes that payment availability for New Zealand accounts can differ between deposits and withdrawals. A cashier showing Flexepin as a deposit option does not confirm that it can receive winnings. The method accepted for funding and the route used to pay out should therefore be treated as separate details, rather than assumed to match.
Where a deposit method cannot receive payouts, the casino may require another destination for the withdrawal. A separate bank account, digital wallet, or cryptocurrency address may be needed, subject to the casino’s rules and payment checks. The destination must be a supported route, not simply the method used to put funds into the account.
This is the practical meaning of a “Flexepin casino withdrawal”: the phrase should not be read as proof that Flexepin itself receives casino winnings. The relevant question is what payout route the casino supports for the specific New Zealand account, and whether that route is available after the casino approves the request. Flexepin funding and receiving a payout are not interchangeable functions.
The useful sequence is therefore: deposit, meet any applicable account or bonus conditions, submit a withdrawal request, pass the casino’s review, then wait for the approved transfer to begin. Combining those stages into one idea makes timing and payment expectations less clear. A deposit receipt confirms a deposit; it does not confirm withdrawal approval or receipt of winnings.
Withdrawal Timing Depends on the Payout Route
The time associated with a Flexepin casino withdrawal is not a single interval. The casino’s approval comes first; only after release does the external transfer begin. A specialist casino-payment review notes that verification, payment checks or bonus conditions can extend the approval stage. Those checks are separate from the time taken by the payout route itself.
After release, the route determines how the money travels. A specialist review describes digital wallets and cryptocurrencies as capable of transferring funds rapidly once the casino has sent them. That is a statement about the transfer stage, not a guaranteed arrival time: the casino’s review has already taken place, and the receiving service still handles the incoming funds.
A bank transfer follows a direct route to a New Zealand bank account. The transfer is therefore tied to the bank route rather than to a prepaid deposit voucher. Card payouts have another dependency: whether the card issuer and payment network support receiving that transaction. A card shown as a deposit option does not, by itself, establish that it can receive a payout.
For a practical comparison, separate the process into two clocks: casino approval and payment transfer after release. A delay before approval belongs to the first; movement through a wallet, cryptocurrency network, bank or card system belongs to the second. Calling both stages “withdrawal time” obscures where the wait occurs. The relevant information is the casino’s stated processing policy and the receiving route’s support, not the speed associated with a deposit method. Flexepin’s role in funding an account cannot establish how quickly winnings reach an external destination.
Reading a Flexepin Casino Promo Code as a Set of Conditions
A Flexepin casino promo code is not a cash amount in itself. It identifies an offer, while the offer’s terms determine what the bonus can do and what restrictions apply to winnings connected with it. The code and its conditions therefore need to be read together; entering the code does not remove the conditions.
A specialist casino review describes bonus-related winnings as potentially subject to several types of restriction. Wagering requirements set out play that must be completed before the relevant winnings become eligible for withdrawal. Game contribution rules determine whether different games count equally towards that requirement. A game that contributes less may take longer to satisfy the stated terms than one that contributes fully.
Reading Promo Conditions
Locate the promo code and the specific offer it activates.
Review eligible games, their contribution rates, and any maximum-bet restrictions.
Identify the wagering requirements and the expiry date of the offer.
Check for a maximum-cashout condition that limits the total amount payable.
The maximum-bet condition concerns stakes placed while the bonus terms remain active. Exceeding the permitted bet may affect eligibility under the offer, so the relevant limit and the period in which it applies matter. Expiry conditions impose a separate boundary: an offer or its wagering requirement may cease to apply after the stated date. These are not interchangeable clauses. A bonus can remain visible in an account while a deadline still affects its use.
A maximum-cashout condition sets a ceiling on the amount payable from bonus-related play. It is distinct from a wagering requirement: completing the required play does not, by itself, cancel a separate payout ceiling. The terms should therefore be checked for both the steps required and any cap that applies afterward.
The useful reading order is the triggering code, eligible games, contribution rules, wagering conditions, betting restrictions, expiry, and cashout terms. That sequence identifies what activates the offer, what activity counts, which conduct may breach its conditions, and what restrictions remain at the end. If the wording is unclear, the offer cannot be assessed reliably from the code alone. A promotional label is packaging; the conditions supply the calculation.
Deposit Bonuses and the Amount That Can Actually Be Withdrawn
A deposit bonus increases the balance shown in a casino account, but that figure is not necessarily the amount available for withdrawal. The relevant amount is determined by the offer’s conditions and the result of play under those conditions. A balance can therefore include funds that remain subject to restrictions rather than being immediately withdrawable.
A specialist review reports that bonus-related winnings can be affected by wagering requirements, rules on which games count and how much they contribute, limits on individual bets, expiry dates, or a cap on cashout. These terms change the calculation in different ways. A wagering condition can leave winnings ineligible for withdrawal until it is met; game contribution rules can make play on some games count differently; and a maximum-bet rule can affect whether winnings remain eligible. An expiry date sets a point after which an offer or related balance may no longer qualify, while a cashout cap can limit the amount payable even when play has produced a larger balance.
The practical comparison is between the displayed balance and the amount the casino would approve under the offer terms. The bonus amount alone does not answer that question. Nor does the label attached to an offer: a bonus connected to a Flexepin deposit and a no-deposit offer can have different conditions, so each offer needs to be assessed on its own terms. Neither label establishes that all resulting funds are withdrawable.
The useful calculation starts with the conditions attached to the specific promotion: what wagering applies, which games count, what betting restrictions are in force, when the offer expires, and whether a maximum cashout applies. If a term is unclear, the final withdrawable amount cannot be reliably estimated from the promotional headline or account balance.
That distinction matters when comparing offers. A larger advertised bonus may produce a smaller payable amount than a lower one if its conditions are more restrictive. The headline is packaging; the withdrawal terms determine the amount.
Account Sign-In, Identity Checks, and Payment Security
Creating an account and signing in are separate from confirming that a casino is authorised to operate. New Zealand’s online casino framework is established by the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026. The Department of Internal Affairs oversees regulation of that framework, while the Gambling Commission hears and decides casino licensing applications, issues online casino licences, and approves changes to licence conditions. These roles are distinct: the Commission handles licensing decisions; the Department has the broader oversight function.
Security Warning
Never supply online banking passwords, card PINs, or one-time login codes through account forms, live chat, or email for verification.
The Act came into force on 1 May 2026, with a transitional period running until 1 December 2026. During that period, providers already serving New Zealand customers before the Act took effect may continue under the transitional provisions. The full licensing regime is expected to become operational in 2027. An account page or payment logo does not, by itself, establish a provider’s licensing position.
Identity checks are part of the account process, not an optional formality to be left until a payout request. Proof of identity is required before a withdrawal can be processed. A casino may also need to complete payment checks and obtain any outstanding account information before approving the request. Until approval is given, the external transfer has not begun.
Payment security depends on distinguishing legitimate verification from requests that expose account credentials. Standard identity checks do not require online banking passwords, card PINs, complete security codes, or one-time login codes. Those credentials should not be supplied through an account form, live chat, or email as a condition of routine verification. Identity documents and payment details should be submitted only through the casino’s designated account process.
A casino must approve a withdrawal before funds are sent externally. Verification, payment checks, or bonus conditions can delay that approval, so a submitted request is not the same as a completed transfer. A request for an unrelated private payment described as a tax, insurance fee, release charge, or account-unlocking payment is not a normal withdrawal step.
For account sign-in, the relevant checks are therefore procedural: the account details should be controlled by the account holder, identity proof must be available for withdrawal review, and licensing status must be considered separately from the ease of opening an account. A smooth registration screen establishes none of those points on its own.
Assessing Casino Payment Options Without Assuming Flexepin Support
A payment menu can show the methods a casino makes available without confirming that every method works for every New Zealand account. A specialist payment review lists Visa, Mastercard, Visa Electron, Skrill, Trustly, Neteller, iDebit and Apple Pay among options available to New Zealand players, but that is not evidence that any particular casino accepts Flexepin. Nor does a method appearing in a general list establish its availability for a specific account.
The distinction matters because payment support has separate parts: whether a method can fund an account and whether it can receive a withdrawal. A method shown for deposits may not be offered for payouts. The cashier and the operator’s payment terms need to be considered together, with the relevant account and currency in view. A brand name on a page is not a complete description of the route money will take.
The same caution applies when comparing alternatives. Cards, digital wallets, bank transfers and cryptocurrency do not have identical settlement routes. Digital wallets and cryptocurrencies may move funds rapidly after the casino releases a payout. A bank transfer provides a direct route to a New Zealand bank account. Card payouts depend on support from both the card issuer and the payment network; seeing a card logo at deposit does not establish that a withdrawal can be sent back to it.
For a Flexepin-focused comparison, the useful question is therefore not whether a site has a broad payment menu, but whether its current cashier explicitly offers Flexepin to eligible New Zealand accounts. The listed alternatives can help describe the wider payment environment, but they cannot be treated as proof of Flexepin support. They also do not establish that a named casino accepts every listed method.
A practical comparison records each route separately: the method offered for deposits, the method permitted for withdrawals, and any conditions attached to that route. Where payout support is unclear, the payment option remains unconfirmed rather than assumed. That is less flattering than a logo-filled cashier, but more useful when the eventual destination of funds matters.
Published by the Casino Slots Tips NZ team.
