Casino Offers in New Zealand: Bonus Terms Explained
Different offer types affect balances and rewards in different ways, while their terms determine what must happen before benefits can be used or withdrawn.

Table of Contents
- The Main Types of Casino Bonuses
- Welcome Bonuses: Match Size Is Only Half the Calculation
- Sign-Up Packages Can Stretch Across Several Deposits
- Casino Offers in 2026: Read the Terms Before the Headline
- No-Deposit Offers: Free Credit, With a Cashout Ceiling
- Online Casino Offers: Expiry Is Part of the Price
- Free Spins and Other Bonus Extras
- Wagering Requirements: The Turnover Behind the Bonus
- Withdrawal Limits and Bonus Cashouts
- Deposit Offers: What a 100% Match Actually Means
The Main Types of Casino Bonuses
Casino bonus offers are easier to compare when the label is separated from the mechanism. A percentage match, free spins, cashback and loyalty points do not represent the same kind of value: each changes the balance or rewards activity in a different way. The useful question is not which format sounds largest, but what has to happen before the benefit can be used or withdrawn.
Cashback: a return linked to losses
Cashback is calculated from net losses across a stated period, rather than from the size of a deposit. The operator totals qualifying losses for that period and returns a share. The period is commonly weekly or monthly, and stated rates are often between 10% and 20%. That makes cashback different from a fixed credit: its amount depends on the result of play.
The word “net” matters. A calculation based on net losses is not the same as a percentage of every wager, nor does it mean that every losing session produces a payment. The offer’s terms determine which activity and period count. A rate should therefore be read together with its calculation base and any conditions attached to the returned amount.
Casino offers can change, so it is worth checking the details that are available before deciding where to play. This list provides a starting point for reviewing options relevant to New Zealand readers.
License: Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000064 Neospin is listed with a licence from the Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000064.
License: Malta Gaming Authority, licence no. MGA/B2C/370/2017 Play Grand is listed with a Malta Gaming Authority licence, no. MGA/B2C/370/2017.
License: Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000091 7Bit Casino is listed with a licence from the Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000091.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Wintino’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Lamabet’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days.
License: Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000002 Ricky Casino is listed with a licence from the Tobique Gaming Commission, licence no. 0000002.
License: Malta Gaming Authority, licence no. MGA/B2C/394/2017 N1 Casino is listed with a Malta Gaming Authority licence, no. MGA/B2C/394/2017.
License: 07017519840 · Payout speed: 1-3 business days Zotabet is listed with licence number 07017519840 and a payout speed of 1–3 business days.
License: Curaçao Gaming Authority, licence no. OGL/2024/165/0185 BitStarz is listed with a Curaçao Gaming Authority licence, no. OGL/2024/165/0185.
A specialist review describes cashback as having no wagering requirement or only a low one. That is a report about the terms it examined, not a rule that applies to every cashback promotion. The label alone cannot establish whether returned funds are withdrawable immediately or subject to further conditions; those details need to be checked in the promotion’s terms.
Loyalty rewards: value accumulated through activity
A loyalty programme rewards ongoing play rather than one qualifying event. One specialist review describes a points model in which spins earn points that can later be exchanged for bonus cash or free spins. In that structure, the points are an intermediate unit, not cash in the account. Their practical value depends on the conversion terms and on what the resulting reward permits.
This format also changes how an offer should be assessed. A points balance may look substantial while still requiring activity before it can be exchanged, and a reward in bonus cash is not necessarily equivalent to withdrawable money. The terms governing accumulation and conversion are therefore part of the value, not fine print separate from it.
Loyalty rewards are distinct from a one-off promotion because they are tied to activity over time. They may suit a player who values repeated accumulation, but the format itself does not establish that the return is generous. Without the conversion rule, the points total cannot be translated into a reliable cash value.
Free spins: a set of game plays, not cash
Free spins grant turns on a slot rather than adding an unrestricted cash amount to the balance. They can appear within a welcome offer or as a standalone promotion, often connected to a particular slot the casino is promoting. The reward is therefore defined partly by the game in which it can be used.
Spin winnings may have their own wagering requirements. A specialist review reports a range of 20x to 40x for wagering attached to free-spin winnings, but the applicable condition is the one stated for the specific offer. The number of spins alone says little about the amount that might become withdrawable: the value of each spin and the rules for any winnings also matter.
Free spins are not the same as a deposit match. One grants a limited form of play; the other adds bonus funds in relation to a deposit. Nor are they the same as cashback, which is calculated from net losses. These distinctions prevent unlike rewards from being compared as if they were interchangeable cash.
No-deposit credit: access without an initial deposit
A no-deposit bonus provides free spins or bonus funds when an account is created, without requiring a deposit as the entry condition. The reported value is modest: a small number of spins or NZ$5–NZ$20 in credit. This describes the starting reward, not necessarily the amount that can ultimately be withdrawn.
Some offers of this kind may apply a cashout cap to winnings generated from the bonus. That condition can make the maximum withdrawable amount lower than the balance displayed during play. The entry cost may be absent, but the terms still determine the financial outcome. This is why a no-deposit label should not be treated as a promise of unrestricted cash.
Calculated from net losses over a period; typically returns 10% to 20%.
Value accumulated through ongoing activity and exchanged via conversion terms.
Restricted turns on specific slots; winnings may have wagering requirements.
Small starting rewards (NZ$5–NZ$20 or spins) provided without an initial deposit.
Match bonuses: an addition tied to a deposit
A deposit match adds bonus funds in relation to a qualifying deposit. A 100% match, for instance, adds bonus funds equal to the deposit amount. The resulting balance contains both deposited money and bonus money, which may not share identical withdrawal conditions.
This format is best understood as a conditional addition, not as cashback or a free-standing reward. The percentage describes how the bonus is calculated; it does not, by itself, describe the amount that can be cashed out. For the calculation to mean anything, the terms attached to the bonus must also be considered.
The labels provide a working vocabulary, not a ranking. Cashback is loss-linked, loyalty rewards accumulate through activity, free spins grant restricted plays, no-deposit offers begin without a deposit, and a match adds funds against one. The strongest-sounding headline may still describe the least useful format for a particular set of terms.
Welcome Bonuses: Match Size Is Only Half the Calculation
A welcome bonus is commonly structured as a deposit match: the casino adds bonus funds in proportion to an eligible deposit. Offers described for New Zealand players often advertise a match between 100% and 200%, sometimes with free spins attached. That percentage measures the bonus against the qualifying deposit; it does not measure the amount that can ultimately be withdrawn.
The headline can also obscure which balance the wagering requirement applies to. A condition tied to bonus funds creates a different turnover obligation from one calculated on the deposit and bonus together. The wording in the terms decides the base. Without that detail, the percentage alone cannot establish the amount of play required or the likely cashout.
Welcome-bonus wagering requirements are commonly reported in a range from 30x to 50x. A specialist affiliate review gives a narrower figure of around 35x to 40x for welcome-package wagering, but that is one review’s account, not a fixed market rule. The difference matters: the same match percentage can produce substantially different conditions when the multiplier or its calculation base changes.
The amount advertised as a match is therefore only the starting line. A 200% headline may sound larger than a 100% one, but a higher bonus can also mean more turnover if wagering is calculated on the bonus amount. The condition needs to be read alongside the bonus ceiling, the minimum qualifying deposit and any rule that changes the wagering base. Those terms determine whether the advertised amount is relevant to the balance that could become withdrawable.
Free spins can be bundled into a welcome offer, but they are a separate component, not extra cash with identical conditions. Their winnings may be governed by their own wagering terms. Combining spins and matched funds in one headline can make the package look like a single benefit when it contains distinct balances and rules. The total promotional value cannot be assessed by adding the advertised figures unless the terms explain how each part is treated.
A useful comparison begins with the exact bonus amount eligible for wagering, then identifies the multiplier and the balance to which it applies. The result is required turnover, not a forecast of winnings. Turnover does not guarantee that a balance will remain after play, and completing it does not by itself answer whether a withdrawal cap, game restriction or maximum bet condition affects the final amount. Those clauses belong in the calculation before any headline is treated as meaningful.
Attention: A higher match percentage can result in a higher turnover requirement if wagering is calculated on the bonus amount.
The label “welcome offer” also says nothing about whether a particular promotion is available to a given account or eligible for a particular payment method. Deposit eligibility and the terms attached to the offer control that question. A match can be advertised in broad language while its conditions limit which transactions qualify. No percentage can compensate for a deposit that does not meet the stated rules.
For New Zealand, this description is informational rather than a recommendation to claim an offer. The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 took effect on 1 May 2026 and provides a transitional period through 1 December 2026 for providers already serving the country before that start date. The full domestic licensing regime is expected to follow in 2027. A promotion’s headline does not establish its legal status or its availability to a particular player.
The accounting test is plain: identify the qualifying deposit, the bonus credited, the wagering base, and the multiplier. Then read the remaining conditions that can affect withdrawal. Until those inputs are clear, the match percentage describes promotional packaging, not cash value.
Sign-Up Packages Can Stretch Across Several Deposits
A welcome package may be divided between multiple deposits rather than paid in full after the first qualifying payment. A specialist review describes this staged structure and notes that free spins may be included as part of the package. The headline total therefore does not describe a single bonus event: it can represent several separate opportunities, each activated by meeting its own conditions.
For every stage, the relevant terms are the minimum deposit, the maximum bonus amount and the wagering requirement. These conditions need to be read together. A deposit can qualify for a stage without earning its maximum bonus if it does not reach the amount needed for the full match; the stage’s cap sets the ceiling. Its wagering condition then determines what must happen before bonus funds can become withdrawable.
The calculation is stage-specific. A package with several stages does not necessarily apply one set of terms across the entire sequence. A specialist review notes that each stage can have a different minimum deposit, bonus ceiling and wagering requirement. Treating the package as one large offer can therefore obscure the amount of money required to access later portions and the separate conditions attached to them.
A useful comparison is a simple schedule of the package:
| Stage | What to record |
|---|---|
| Each deposit stage | Minimum deposit and maximum bonus |
| Each bonus award | Wagering requirement and the amount to which it applies |
| Any free-spin component | How it is awarded and the conditions attached |
The schedule prevents the total advertised value from doing the accounting. If a later stage requires another deposit, its bonus is conditional on that additional payment; it is not part of the balance earned from the first stage. Likewise, a generous ceiling on one stage does not establish that the remaining stages have the same ceiling or the same wagering terms.
Timing can also affect whether the sequence is practical. A specialist review reports that bonuses and free spins may need to be used within a period ranging from 7 to 30 days. That range is not a universal deadline for every package. The terms for the specific stage determine when its bonus becomes available and when it expires. If stages have separate clocks, the first award may be running out while the player is still considering whether to make another qualifying deposit.
Free spins add another line to the calculation, not a substitute for checking the deposit stages. Where they form part of a welcome package, their inclusion does not show that every deposit qualifies for them, or that their winnings follow the same conditions as bonus cash. The package terms need to identify which stage triggers the spins and what rules apply to their proceeds.
- Check the minimum deposit for each stage
- Verify the specific wagering requirement per bonus
- Track the expiry deadline for each award
- Assume one set of terms applies to the whole package
- Rely on the total advertised headline value
- Treat later stage bonuses as part of the first balance
For New Zealand readers, these mechanics are informational rather than a recommendation to claim an offer. During the transitional period established by the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026, the law permits providers already operating in New Zealand before 1 May 2026 to continue until 1 December 2026, subject to the Act’s provisions. A package’s advertised total does not alter that legal context.
The useful figure is not the sum printed beside the package name. It is the amount available at each stage after its deposit threshold, bonus ceiling, wagering condition and deadline are considered separately. When those entries cannot be compared on the same basis, the headline total is packaging, not a cash value.
Casino Offers in 2026: Read the Terms Before the Headline
A large headline figure describes the promotional credit, not the amount that can be withdrawn. The cashout depends on the offer’s conditions: whether wagering is required, which games count, whether a maximum bet applies while the bonus is active, and whether bonus-derived winnings face a cashout cap. Those details determine the financial result; the headline does not.
A specialist casino review describes bonuses with no wagering requirements as rare. That is a source-specific assessment, not a guarantee that a particular offer is free of turnover conditions. “No wagering” should be verified in the offer’s own terms, alongside any other restrictions. A bonus can have no turnover requirement and still limit the amount of winnings that may be withdrawn or impose other conditions.
The same distinction applies when a promotion is labelled “new” or “best”. Those words do not specify eligibility, the games included, or what happens to winnings. An offer’s value cannot be assessed from its advertised amount alone. If a maximum bet applies during wagering, exceeding it can void bonus winnings; a cashout cap can reduce the withdrawable amount even after the offer’s conditions have been met. These are material terms, not footnotes to the headline.
New Zealand’s legal position also affects how offers should be understood in 2026. The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 took effect on 1 May 2026 and established the country’s first domestic licensing framework for online casino gaming. During the transitional period, which runs from 1 May to 1 December 2026, providers already serving New Zealand before the Act took effect may continue operating under the transition provisions. The full licensed regime is not expected to be operational until 2027.
That transition does not make every offer a locally licensed promotion. Before the Act, offshore online casino gambling was not licensed or supervised by a New Zealand regulator, and customers had no domestic government recourse. The legal change should therefore not be read as confirmation that every website currently accessible to New Zealand residents is licensed under the new framework. Nor does a promotion’s availability establish that its terms are favourable.
During the transitional period from 1 May to 1 December 2026, providers already serving New Zealand before the Act may continue operating under transition provisions.
A practical assessment starts with the terms that affect the final balance: the wagering condition, eligible games, maximum bet while the bonus is active, any cashout cap, and whether the offer is sticky or non-sticky. A sticky bonus remains unavailable for withdrawal under its terms; a non-sticky structure treats the deposited balance differently from the bonus funds. The distinction matters because the two balances may not have the same withdrawal conditions.
The most favourable-looking casino offer can produce a poor cashout if its conditions restrict play or limit withdrawals. A less dramatic promotion may be easier to evaluate if its terms are clear and the bonus-derived funds can be distinguished from the deposit. In 2026, the headline is only the opening figure. The terms and the regulatory context determine what that figure means.
No-Deposit Offers: Free Credit, With a Cashout Ceiling
A no-deposit bonus provides promotional value without requiring a payment into the account. Depending on the offer, that value may arrive as free spins or as bonus funds. The distinction matters: spins are tied to play on a slot, while credit appears as a balance, but neither should be treated as cash merely because it is visible in an account.
For account creation, the amounts described for New Zealand-facing offers are modest: a limited batch of free spins or credit in the NZ$5–NZ$20 range. The figure is the starting promotional value, not a guaranteed amount that can be withdrawn. A result from bonus play may be subject to conditions that separate the displayed balance from the cash available for withdrawal.
That is where a cashout cap can change the calculation. A specialist review has reported that some no-deposit and free-spin offers limit withdrawals from winnings generated by the bonus. This is a reported term, not a universal feature of every offer. Where such a cap applies, the permitted withdrawal may be lower than the balance shown after play; any excess would not form part of the payable amount under that condition. The cap therefore deserves attention alongside the initial credit or spin count.
The absence of a deposit changes the entry cost, not the need to read the offer’s rules. A no-deposit deal can still restrict how promotional funds are used and what happens to resulting winnings. If the offer states a cashout ceiling, that term sets a hard limit on the practical value of a successful run. A larger-looking bonus is not necessarily better if the amount that can leave the account is tightly constrained.
These offers also differ from deposit-match promotions in the point at which money enters the arrangement. No-deposit credit is issued without a deposit; a deposit match depends on one. That does not make the former automatically more generous. The comparison has to account for the form of the bonus and any limit on cashing out bonus-derived winnings, rather than relying on the label “free.”
The term “no deposit” describes only the initial payment requirement. It does not establish that the offer has no other conditions, that winnings are unrestricted, or that withdrawals are fast. Bonus format alone says nothing about payout timing. A free-spin award may produce a small balance or a larger one, but the amount that can ultimately be withdrawn depends on the applicable terms, including any stated cap.
Cashout Caps
Some no-deposit offers limit the maximum withdrawable amount, making the actual payout lower than the displayed balance.
In New Zealand, these offers are best understood as conditional promotional credit rather than cash handed over for opening an account. Their headline value records what is offered at the start; the cashout ceiling, where one applies, defines how much of the resulting winnings may be retained. A useful comparison therefore begins with the final payable amount allowed by the terms, not the promotional figure displayed beside the offer.
Online Casino Offers: Expiry Is Part of the Price
A bonus has a usable life as well as a stated value. If its conditions are not completed before the expiry point, bonus funds do not become withdrawable. The practical value therefore depends not only on what is offered, but on whether the available time is sufficient to use it.
A specialist review reports that some bonuses have validity windows of seven to thirty days, while others can expire in less than a week. These are reported examples, not a fixed timetable for every promotion. The terms attached to an individual offer determine its actual deadline and what happens when that deadline passes.
Expiry changes the calculation because unfinished wagering is not simply postponed. Once the offer expires, the remaining bonus balance may no longer be available, and wagering that has not been completed does not produce withdrawable bonus funds. A headline amount can therefore overstate the amount that is realistically usable when the clock is short.
The key detail is when the validity period begins. The terms may tie it to a particular event, such as acceptance or activation, so the stated duration alone does not establish the final date. The rules also need to say whether expiry applies to the bonus balance, any winnings derived from it, or both. Without that distinction, the deadline is clear only in appearance.
A short window matters most when the offer requires substantial play before conversion. The time limit does not reduce the stated wagering requirement; it restricts the period in which that requirement can be completed. If play stops or the deadline arrives first, the remaining balance cannot be treated as cash waiting to be withdrawn. The value of an offer is conditional on finishing its requirements in time.
This makes timing a separate cost, not a minor footnote. A promotion with a longer validity period may allow more flexibility, while a shorter one leaves less room for interrupted play. That comparison does not establish which offer is better on its own: the amount of work required and the consequences of expiry still matter. A generous headline attached to a narrow window can amount to little if completion is not feasible.
The terms should be read for the expiry date, the event that starts the clock, and the result of missing the deadline. Where free spins or other promotional features are included, their own validity conditions may also apply; one deadline should not be assumed to cover every part of an offer. The wording needs to establish which balance or benefit expires and whether unfinished progress is lost.
For New Zealand readers assessing online promotions, the calendar belongs in the same calculation as the advertised bonus. An offer is not worth its headline amount merely because that amount appears in the terms. If the usable period ends before the required conditions are met, the cashout value of the bonus is zero.
Bonus Expiry
If wagering requirements are not completed before the deadline, the bonus balance and any associated winnings are lost.
Free Spins and Other Bonus Extras
Free spins are a separate promotional extra, not another name for a deposit match. They may be attached to a welcome offer or issued on their own, and a standalone promotion may be tied to a particular slot. The advertised spin count therefore says little about what the spins can return: the selected game and the rules for handling winnings matter as well.
A spin can produce a win without making that amount immediately withdrawable. A specialist casino review describes wagering requirements on free-spin winnings in the range of 20x to 40x. That is a reported range, not a universal condition. The offer terms determine whether wagering applies, what amount it is based on and which games count toward it. The cash value of a spin is not the same as cash available to withdraw.
Free spins also differ from no-deposit credit. No-deposit bonuses provide spins or bonus funds without a deposit, whereas a free-spin extra may be attached to a deposit-based welcome offer. In either case, winnings can be subject to conditions distinct from the spin count itself. A headline promising a block of spins leaves the key calculation unresolved until those conditions are checked.
Some promotions are not presented as a fixed offer available to every account. A specialist review reports that logged-in players at some casinos may receive between 5 and 50 spins at unpredictable times during the day. That describes a reported promotional mechanism, not a dependable entitlement or a basis for valuing an offer. An occasional award has no fixed cash value if its game, wagering rules and withdrawal conditions are unknown.
The useful comparison is therefore not simply the number of spins. It is whether the spins are bundled with another promotion or offered independently, which slot they apply to, and what happens to any resulting winnings. If wagering is attached, the required turnover can outweigh the apparent value of the extra; that calculation depends on the specific terms, rather than the label “free.”
A free-spin promotion should be assessed as a conditional credit, not as a guaranteed cash return. Its face value may be limited by the game selection and the wagering applied to winnings, while its practical value depends on whether the conditions can be met. Without those details, a larger spin count is only a larger count.
Wagering Requirements: The Turnover Behind the Bonus
A wagering requirement is a turnover target: the amount of qualifying bets that must be placed before bonus funds can be withdrawn. The multiplier applies to a defined base, which may be the bonus amount or another amount specified in the terms. Those definitions matter; the same multiplier can produce different turnover targets if the base changes.
Bonus requirements can span 15x to 100x. A specialist casino review reports a narrower range of 35x to 40x for many New Zealand bonuses, but that is a source-specific observation, not a fixed market rule. The written terms determine the actual requirement for an offer.
Game contribution changes how quickly turnover accumulates. Pokies generally count at 100%, so a qualifying stake adds its full value to the target. Table games and live dealer games may contribute 10% or less, or be excluded altogether. A stake on a game with a 10% contribution therefore adds only a tenth of its value to qualifying turnover. If a game contributes nothing, bets on it do not advance the target.
Calculating Turnover
Determine if the multiplier applies to the bonus amount or the combined deposit and bonus.
Multiply the identified base by the wagering requirement (e.g., 40x) to find the target turnover.
Account for game weights, where pokies may count 100% but table games may count 10% or less.
This can make the headline multiplier an incomplete measure of the work involved. A requirement calculated against bonus funds is not equivalent to the same multiplier against a larger balance, and a low-contribution game can leave most of the nominal betting amount uncounted. The relevant calculation is the stated base multiplied by the wagering requirement, then adjusted for the contribution rate of each eligible game.
The terms should identify which games count and at what rate, as well as any exclusions. A game that appears playable may still make no progress towards the requirement. Bonus buy features can also be excluded under some promotion rules, so the eligible-game wording matters more than the game’s presence in the lobby.
A no-wagering offer has no turnover target to clear, but that label should be verified in the conditions: any attached playthrough requirement changes the cashout calculation. “Matched betting” is a separate betting strategy, not a wagering multiplier or a casino bonus condition. Neither phrase changes the arithmetic of a casino requirement.
The practical measure is not the largest bonus balance. It is the qualifying turnover needed, the games that count, and the share of each stake credited to that turnover.
Withdrawal Limits and Bonus Cashouts
A withdrawal cap sets a ceiling on the amount of bonus-derived money that can be paid out. A specialist review describes this condition for some casino bonuses; it should therefore be treated as an offer-specific term, not assumed to apply to every promotion.
The cap changes the cashout calculation. A balance accumulated from bonus play may exceed the amount eligible for withdrawal, with the excess unavailable for payment under that offer’s rules. The displayed balance and the payable balance are not necessarily the same figure. Before assigning value to a promotion, the cap needs to be read alongside the definition of which winnings it covers and when it applies.
Withdrawal speed is a separate question. A stated cap does not establish how quickly a payment is processed, and a fast-processing claim would not reveal how much bonus-derived money can be withdrawn. These are distinct conditions: one concerns timing, the other the maximum payable amount. Neither can be inferred from the size of a bonus or the balance shown on screen.
For any offer, the relevant comparison is between the amount shown as winnings and the amount the terms permit to leave the account. If a cashout cap applies, that ceiling may determine the practical outcome even when the displayed balance is higher. The cap should be checked before accepting the offer, not after wagering has turned bonus funds into a balance that appears withdrawable.
Deposit Offers: What a 100% Match Actually Means
A 100% deposit match adds bonus funds equal to the qualifying deposit. A $100 deposit therefore receives $100 in bonus funds, producing a displayed balance of $200. That balance is not necessarily $200 available for withdrawal: the bonus portion may remain subject to wagering requirements and other conditions.
The arithmetic becomes clearer when the wagering basis is stated. A specialist review gives this illustration: with a $100 deposit, a 100% match and a 40x wagering requirement, the balance reaches $200 and the required turnover is $8,000 before withdrawal. The multiplier in that calculation applies to the combined balance, not just the bonus. Offer terms can use a different basis, so the headline match alone cannot establish the turnover.
A proper comparison of deposit offers separates three figures: the cash deposited, the bonus credited and the amount that must be wagered. It also checks which games count, whether the bonus is sticky, the maximum bet caps while wagering and any cashout cap on bonus-derived winnings. Exceeding a stated maximum bet can void bonus winnings; a withdrawal cap can reduce the amount available even after wagering is complete.
These conditions determine the practical value of casino site offers more than the match percentage does. A larger bonus also increases the required turnover when wagering is calculated against the bonus or combined balance. The relevant deposit offers at a casino are therefore not defined by the headline alone, but by the amount that can ultimately be withdrawn under the stated terms.
Published by the Casino Slots Tips NZ team.
